- Trump’s likely foreign policy changes focus on isolationism and recalibration of US priorities.
- Key appointments hint at a more aggressive stance on China and reduced aid to Ukraine.
- Biden’s multilateral approach and alliances face reevaluation under Trump’s leadership.
- Trump’s foreign policy promises a departure from global commitments, favoring “America First.”
With Donald Trump’s victory in the November 5 US presidential election, the foreign policy trajectory of the United States is poised for a significant shift. Over the past four years, the Biden-Harris administration prioritized multilateralism and rebuilding alliances, with an emphasis on supporting Ukraine, countering China, and reinforcing ties with Israel. However, Trump’s victory suggests a stark departure from these policies, as hinted by his early announcements regarding appointments to top foreign policy positions.
A Legacy of Reversals: Biden’s Undoing of Trump’s Policies
Upon taking office in January 2021, President Joe Biden rapidly set about reversing several hallmark policies of the Trump administration.
Biden’s foreign policy was heavily characterized by a commitment to repairing alliances, an approach that was in stark contrast to Trump’s often unilateral and isolationist tendencies. Yet, this strategy has drawn both praise and criticism. While proponents commend Biden for restoring the US’s credibility on the world stage, detractors argue that some measures were overly reactive to Trump’s legacy rather than forward-thinking.
Biden’s immediate actions included rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement, lifting travel restrictions on certain Muslim-majority countries, and halting construction of the US-Mexico border wall. Additionally, he restored US participation in the World Health Organization (WHO) and signed dozens of executive orders aimed at realigning America’s global standing.
Biden’s foreign policy legacy faces scrutiny after Trump’s 2024 victory
Biden’s foreign policy was heavily characterized by a commitment to repairing alliances, an approach that was in stark contrast to Trump’s often unilateral and isolationist tendencies.
Muslims Voice Concerns Over Trump’s Pro-Israel Cabinet Picks
Yet, this strategy has drawn both praise and criticism. While proponents commend Biden for restoring the US’s credibility on the world stage, detractors argue that some measures were overly reactive to Trump’s legacy rather than forward-thinking.
Strong Backing for Ukraine
A cornerstone of Biden’s foreign policy was the unwavering support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia. Following Russia’s invasion in February 2022, the administration provided $64.1 billion in military aid, including advanced defense systems such as Patriot missiles. The White House also mobilized NATO allies to provide critical assistance, including F-16 fighter jets, to strengthen Kyiv’s resistance.
US Presidential Election: Strategic Implications for US-China Relations.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s multiple visits to the White House and bipartisan backing in Congress underscored the administration’s commitment to Ukraine. However, Trump’s rhetoric throughout his campaign suggested a dramatic pivot. He criticized Biden’s spending on Ukraine, emphasizing that such aid drained resources from domestic priorities. Trump’s potential isolationist stance could dramatically alter the geopolitical landscape in Eastern Europe, as allies fear reduced US involvement could embolden Russian aggression.
The Gaza Conflict: An Intensely Polarizing Issue
Biden’s approach to the ongoing conflict in Gaza became a flashpoint in the administration’s final year. The Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, prompted the Biden administration to double down on its support for Israel, requesting an additional $17.9 billion in military aid to supplement the $3.5 billion provided annually.
This unwavering support, coupled with three US vetoes of UN Security Council resolutions calling for a cease-fire, drew sharp domestic and international criticism. The administration faced accusations of ignoring humanitarian concerns in Gaza, with aid organizations reporting significant obstacles to the delivery of humanitarian assistance. Critics contend that Biden’s approach eroded US credibility as a mediator in the Middle East, a narrative Trump has leveraged by promising a more “balanced” strategy, though specifics remain vague.
Countering China: A Competitive Posture
The Biden administration’s foreign policy also focused heavily on countering China’s rising influence, particularly in technology, trade, and military sectors. Measures included imposing sanctions on Chinese firms tied to Beijing’s military, enhancing semiconductor restrictions, and bolstering alliances in the Indo-Pacific through the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad).
While Biden sought to navigate the US-China relationship cautiously—lifting some tariffs while increasing security guarantees to Taiwan—Trump’s proposed policy marks a stark contrast. His campaign rhetoric suggests a more aggressive decoupling from China, with proposed tariffs and tougher economic sanctions targeting Beijing’s technological ambitions. Trump’s potential appointments to top roles, including hardliners with hawkish views on China, signal a more confrontational US stance.
Trump’s Vision: A Shift Toward Isolationism?
Trump’s hints at key appointments in his administration point to a significant reshaping of US foreign policy. His past choices of personnel have often reflected his “America First” doctrine, favoring advisors skeptical of multilateral agreements and international organizations. Reports suggest that Trump may opt for officials who align with his vision of reduced international entanglements and a focus on domestic interests.
Critics argue that such an approach risks alienating allies and undermining the US’s global influence. However, Trump’s supporters see it as a necessary recalibration to prioritize national interests over costly international commitments.
Challenges and Implications
Trump’s potential foreign policy realignment poses challenges on several fronts. A rollback of support for Ukraine could weaken NATO’s unity and embolden adversaries like Russia. Similarly, a shift in US-Israel relations could alter the dynamics of Middle East peace processes. Meanwhile, a more aggressive stance on China risks escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific, particularly concerning Taiwan.
Moreover, Trump’s hinted disengagement from international climate agreements and trade pacts could have long-term implications for global cooperation on issues like climate change and economic stability.
Looking Ahead
As Trump prepares to assume office, the world watches closely to see how his appointments shape the next chapter of US foreign policy. While Biden’s tenure emphasized collaboration and multilateralism, Trump’s return could herald a period of unpredictability and recalibration. His potential policies, particularly in the contexts of Ukraine, Gaza, and China, promise to redefine America’s role on the global stage in ways that will have far-reaching consequences.
The transition underscores a larger debate about the US’s place in the world and the balance between global leadership and national priorities. With Trump’s return, allies and adversaries alike are bracing for a new era of US foreign policy—one likely marked by bold moves, controversial decisions, and a reassertion of the “America First” ethos.